<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Asterisk Unicall</title>
	<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall</link>
	<description>Asterisk Unicall &#038; R2 Information Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by moy</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-72</link>
		<author>moy</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I have no experience with Uruguay variant, try ITU, if that does not work let me know and probably we can work together to add Uruguay support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no experience with Uruguay variant, try ITU, if that does not work let me know and probably we can work together to add Uruguay support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by edwin.lam</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-71</link>
		<author>edwin.lam</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>thanks Moy. i changed the uc_statet2str to uc_state2str in unicall.h, that seems to work. 
now the phone company i connect to uses Uruguay R2 variant. i've noticed there's no Uruguay in mfcr2.c. would that compatible with ITU? if not. is there any pointers on how do i go about customizing it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Moy. i changed the uc_statet2str to uc_state2str in unicall.h, that seems to work.<br />
now the phone company i connect to uses Uruguay R2 variant. i&#8217;ve noticed there&#8217;s no Uruguay in mfcr2.c. would that compatible with ITU? if not. is there any pointers on how do i go about customizing it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by moy</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-70</link>
		<author>moy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;jsolares: "I would need the full logs to be able to tell" was meant for you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;edwin.Iam: I just discussed this bug in my blog at http://www.moythreads.com/wordpress/2008/05/25/a-tale-of-two-bugs/ , the first bug I mention is the bug you are facing, you can find the answer there. It's just a typo in a Unicall header that is causing the crash.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jsolares: &#8220;I would need the full logs to be able to tell&#8221; was meant for you.</p>
<p>edwin.Iam: I just discussed this bug in my blog at <a href="http://www.moythreads.com/wordpress/2008/05/25/a-tale-of-two-bugs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.moythreads.com/wordpress/2008/05/25/a-tale-of-two-bugs/</a> , the first bug I mention is the bug you are facing, you can find the answer there. It&#8217;s just a typo in a Unicall header that is causing the crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by moy</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-69</link>
		<author>moy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I would need the full logs to be able to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would need the full logs to be able to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by edwin.lam</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-68</link>
		<author>edwin.lam</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>hello Moy.

i downloaded and built astunicall-1.4.18-0.2 on Debian Etch (AMD64). when i got to
building asterisk. i got "relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC". so i went ahead and put "-fPIC" in CFLAG. it seems to build fine afterward. but when i start Asterisk. i got segfault right when it load chan_unicall.so.  any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Moy.</p>
<p>i downloaded and built astunicall-1.4.18-0.2 on Debian Etch (AMD64). when i got to<br />
building asterisk. i got &#8220;relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol&#8217; can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC&#8221;. so i went ahead and put &#8220;-fPIC&#8221; in CFLAG. it seems to build fine afterward. but when i start Asterisk. i got segfault right when it load chan_unicall.so.  any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by jsolares</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-67</link>
		<author>jsolares</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Weird that was cut off,

I got a protocol analyzer to try and see what could be wrong.

this is a non working call
0032.658 A-3            B  Adr cmp B
0032.808         II-1   F  Sub w/o p
0032.878 B-6            B  Sub LFC
0045.827         1001   F  ClrForwd
0045.867 1001              Idle

this is a working call
0021.178 A-3            B  Adr cmp B
0021.328         II-1   F  Sub w/o p
0021.398 B-6            B  Sub LFC
0026.477 0101           B  Answered
0030.947         1001   F  ClrForwd
0030.967 1001              Idle

on the non working call ringing stopped and audio got connected then the call was hung up. i see that astersik/unicall never sent 0101 to the remote R2 so probably that end timed out and sent the 1001 back to asterisk/unicall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird that was cut off,</p>
<p>I got a protocol analyzer to try and see what could be wrong.</p>
<p>this is a non working call<br />
0032.658 A-3            B  Adr cmp B<br />
0032.808         II-1   F  Sub w/o p<br />
0032.878 B-6            B  Sub LFC<br />
0045.827         1001   F  ClrForwd<br />
0045.867 1001              Idle</p>
<p>this is a working call<br />
0021.178 A-3            B  Adr cmp B<br />
0021.328         II-1   F  Sub w/o p<br />
0021.398 B-6            B  Sub LFC<br />
0026.477 0101           B  Answered<br />
0030.947         1001   F  ClrForwd<br />
0030.967 1001              Idle</p>
<p>on the non working call ringing stopped and audio got connected then the call was hung up. i see that astersik/unicall never sent 0101 to the remote R2 so probably that end timed out and sent the 1001 back to asterisk/unicall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by jsolares</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-66</link>
		<author>jsolares</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Hi moy,

I'm having a weird problem, it might be caused by timing issues somewhere, we're testing the platform so we have someone calling out hanging up when the call connectes and start it over again, out of 30 calls 4 failed, what i found is that the ones that connected correctly had MFC/R2 UniCall/1 0101  -&#62;      [1/ACCEPTED/Answer        /Accepted Paid] whereas the ones that failed had MFC/R2 UniCall/1      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi moy,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a weird problem, it might be caused by timing issues somewhere, we&#8217;re testing the platform so we have someone calling out hanging up when the call connectes and start it over again, out of 30 calls 4 failed, what i found is that the ones that connected correctly had MFC/R2 UniCall/1 0101  -&gt;      [1/ACCEPTED/Answer        /Accepted Paid] whereas the ones that failed had MFC/R2 UniCall/1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by jetm</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-65</link>
		<author>jetm</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I already know it for the next occasion. I wrote the commentary thinking about you (Hispanic loudspeaker) and not in the community. 

Thanks for its correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already know it for the next occasion. I wrote the commentary thinking about you (Hispanic loudspeaker) and not in the community. </p>
<p>Thanks for its correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by moy</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-64</link>
		<author>moy</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>en este mundo gabachizado no vas a llegar muy lejos  en cuanto a tecnología se refiere sin inglés, por ello este sitio está en inglés, y porque gente de brasil u otros paises no hispano-parlantes nos visitan. Si puedes escribir inglés por favor en un futuro escribe en inglés en este blog, si no, pues  ni hablar asi está bien :)

La respuesta corta a tu pregunta es, si, recompilar completamente el Asterisk. Es la forma mas sencilla de hacerlo. De otro modo, requieres conocimientos de C y ganas de investigar, puesto que no he escrito ningun tutorial de como hacerlo con Asterisk pre-instalados.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>en este mundo gabachizado no vas a llegar muy lejos  en cuanto a tecnología se refiere sin inglés, por ello este sitio está en inglés, y porque gente de brasil u otros paises no hispano-parlantes nos visitan. Si puedes escribir inglés por favor en un futuro escribe en inglés en este blog, si no, pues  ni hablar asi está bien <img src='http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>La respuesta corta a tu pregunta es, si, recompilar completamente el Asterisk. Es la forma mas sencilla de hacerlo. De otro modo, requieres conocimientos de C y ganas de investigar, puesto que no he escrito ningun tutorial de como hacerlo con Asterisk pre-instalados.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chan Unicall for Asterisk 1.4.18 by jetm</title>
		<link>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-63</link>
		<author>jetm</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/2008/03/08/chan-unicall-for-asterisk-1418/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Hola:

En la forma que está el comprimido,

¿Habría que recompilar completamente el asterisk?
O
¿Sería como pasar un patch sin modificar el asterisk original?

Mis preguntas es teniendo en cuenta a los  Asterisks pre-instalado en un AsteriskNOW, Elastix, Trixbox, etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola:</p>
<p>En la forma que está el comprimido,</p>
<p>¿Habría que recompilar completamente el asterisk?<br />
O<br />
¿Sería como pasar un patch sin modificar el asterisk original?</p>
<p>Mis preguntas es teniendo en cuenta a los  Asterisks pre-instalado en un AsteriskNOW, Elastix, Trixbox, etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
